1. Design & Experiment
The design phase is the first stage of the prompt lifecycle and involves developing the initial prompt or the idea to improve an existing prompt. The design of a new prompt is not simply the prompt you come up with. It's essential to create a prompt that is effective and has good prompt economics. A complete prompt is a combination of the following:
Prompt text
LLM provider and specific model
Configuration of hyperparameters
Any combination of these should be considered a unique prompt and handled throughout the prompt lifecycle. During this phase, one of the pain points is keeping track of all the prompt variations you are considering or developing.
A new prompt or new variation of an existing one can have different goals:
Adding new features and use cases
Adding new LLMs and models for existing use cases
Continuous improvement efforts identified in stage 5 of the prompt lifecycle
Prompt optimization to reduce costs while maintaining effectiveness
Improving user satisfaction, based on collected feedback
Specific tooling for this stage consists of the following:
Selecting the right LLM provider and specific model
The configuration of hyperparameters that result in high-quality responses
Estimation of prompt economics
A playground to see potential responses allows variation testing
2. Differentiate & Personalize
After designing a prompt, the second stage involves differentiating and personalizing it and its hyperparameters. This stage requires specific tooling for managing variations:
The granular roll-out of new experiments and versions across different environments
Defining rules and conditions for serving specific variants
Versioning of prompts and configurations
Intuitive variation testing
3. Serve & Operate
Once a new prompt is considered ready for application use, the changes must propagate throughout the DevOps cycle on different non-production environments (development, test, acceptance, production). But, even in production, applications would need customization of prompts. These customizations can potentially be due to the following:
Roles
Personalization
Localization
Product tiers and subscriptions
Canary releases and A/B testing
Specific tooling required in this phase:
MLOps tools
Low-latency and secure serving of prompts
Real-time logging and insights
Versioning and rollbacks
Customization of prompts and configurations being served in a custom context
Tracing and auditing of prompts for compliance
4. Analyze Feedback & Adapt
The fourth stage of the prompt lifecycle involves monitoring and collecting feedback. This stage requires specific tooling such as logs, analytics, and feedback software. Pain points associated with this stage include the need for transparency on which prompt is served in particular contexts and the qualitative and quantitative feedback about its effectiveness. In this case, qualitative feedback is user satisfaction, and quantitative feedback is performance and prompt economics. These data points collected asynchronously must be related to the specific prompt evaluated and served. Additionally, since you're running on production, DevOps tooling is needed to keep control of your tech stack.
Specific tooling required in this phase:
Quality and satisfaction feedback collection
Prompt economics and performance metrics across LLMs and models
Kill switches and feature flags
Finally, the lifecycle closes the continuous improvement cycle and involves analyzing and improving the prompt. Based on the qualitative and quantitative feedback collected, improvements can be hypothesized and (re)designed in phase 1.
Tooling required in this phase:
Data analysis of served prompt variations and performance over time
Dashboards
Recommendation agents
By understanding the prompt lifecycle and the pain points associated with each stage, product teams can at least be aware of potential pain points and tools for remediation.
The Current State of Tooling Solutions for Prompt Lifecycle Management
Many prompt engineering practitioners are still in the honeymoon period of excitement and building shallow gadgets. There are no best practices and tooling yet for conducting DevOps for your LLM's prompt-infused applications. This is quite an underserved niche.
A lot of the existing tooling focuses on teams that do more fundamental work, such as
Building their own models
Training and fine-tuning with custom or proprietary data
Store and compute LLM models
Addressing the Limitations of Current Tooling Solutions
To summarize, the current gaps we see in tooling for prompt engineering are:
Prompt lifecycle management
No-code collaboration
Multi-LLM and multi-modal configurations
Versioning
Integrated multi-LLM playgrounds
Single source of truth preventing fragmentation
Business Rules and Remote Configurations
Context-aware serving of prompt variations
Personalization
Localization
DevOps capabilities
Kill-switches and feature flags
Staged roll-outs and canary releases
Enterprise-grade security
Traceability and auditing of served prompts
Orquesta AI Prompts
We empower product teams to engineer with the Orquesta Cloud suite of building blocks.
Orquesta AI Prompts infuses your existing tech stack with prompt engineering capabilities with a couple of lines of code and enables you to conduct LLM Ops. Get a grip on your prompt lifecycle management and use enterprise-grade tooling.
Read more about Orquesta AI Prompts